Child Survival Technical Support


Oct-06-08

Documents
USAID
TRMs
CSTS
Other Documents
Features
Search Our Site
Site Map
Workshop/Meeting Registration
CS Web Links
Contact Us




Child Survival Technical Support

About CSTS Documents Projects Tools CSTS Workshops


Available M&E / assessment resources for all components of the CSSA

Some existing resources for assessment or monitoring and evaluation in the three dimensions of the CSSA framework

Dimension I: Health and health services
Component I.1 Health status
Component I.2: Services, delivery, approach and quality
Resources helpful for both components

Dimension II: Local Organizational Dimension
Component II.1: Local Organizational Capacity
Component II.2: Local Organizational Viability
Resources helpful for both components

Dimension III: Community & Social Ecological Dimension
Component III.1.: Community Competence / Capacity
Component III.2.: Social ecological environment



Dimension I: Health and Health services

Component I.1: Health status

  • The Review of Health and Agriculture Monitoring Tools for Title II Funded PVOs/NGOs (prepared by Davis, T. and Mobley, J.) inventories tools for monitoring proxies of health outcomes at the beneficiary-level (“adoption of practices and acquisition of knowledge,”) as well as “quality of service delivery and key processes,” and “client satisfaction.” http://www.foodaidmanagement.org/MandEToolkit.html

Component I.2: Services, delivery, approach and quality

  • The Quality Assurance Project (QAP) presents tools for monitoring the quality of care at the Primary Care and Hospital level, and many resources on quality improvement and evaluation. http://www.qaproject.org/index1.html
  • EngenderHealth has Quality Assessment / Quality Improvement tools for FP/RH and CS services, using the Client-Oriented Provider-Efficient (COPE) method: handbook, self-assessment guides for Reproductive Health Services, Child Health and Maternal Health Services


  • Community COPE® is a participatory process and set of tools designed to help health care workers build partnerships with community members in order to improve local health services http://www.engenderhealth.org/pubs/pubslist.html#quality
    Email: info@engenderhealth.org
  • Sustaining the benefits: a field guide for sustaining reproductive and child health services. (Abrar A. Kahn and Lisa Hare. 2003. The CEDPA training manual series.) focuses on the sustainability of services through Social Enterprises. It deals with service approaches, institutional sustainability assessment for NGOs, financial and cost issues. http://www.cedpa.org/cgi/cedpastore/new00013.html?id=Vpcp2gsx
  • The International Planned Parenthood Federation has a “Sustainability Initiative” of its own and presents strategies relating to sustainability - Sustainability of Service, Institutional Sustainability and Financial Sustainability – its focus is case studies more than M&E tools. http://www.ippf.org/initiatives/sustainability/2000feb/index.htm
  • WHO offers a rating of Maternal and Neonatal Health services according to emergency and routine services, including family planning, at health centres and district hospitals, access to these services for both rural and urban women, the likelihood that women receive particular forms of antenatal and delivery care, and supporting elements of programmes such as policy, resources, monitoring, health promotion and training. www.who.int/bulletin/pdf/2002/ bul-9-E-2002/80(9)721-727.pdf
  • Child survival and health interventions might want to assess more rigorously whether services are targeting poor communities as part of their approach. One tool, which might allow doing so, the CGAP Poverty Assessment Tool, has been developed and used to assess the depth of outreach of MFIs (micro finance institutions). It provides rigorous data on the levels of poverty of clients relative to people within the same community through the construction of a multidimensional poverty index. The tool, however, involves a survey of 200 randomly selected clients and 300 non-clients, takes about four months to complete and costs around $10,000. http://www.microfinancegateway.org/poverty/pat.htm
    MCDI uses a "Household Health Financing Survey" tool along with an assessment of health expenditures to look at issues of financial accessibility of services.

Resources helpful for both health status and services components

  • USAID’s Development Experience Clearinghouse has a page of Evaluation Publications, including the useful TIPS series, which provides guidance on using the Results Framework, measuring institutional capacity and the general quality of indicators and performance measures. http://www.dec.org/evals.cfm#1

Dimension II: Local Organizational Dimension

Component II.1.: Local Organizational Capacity

  • "A Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation of Capacity-Building Interventions in the Health Sector in Developing Countries" (LaFond A and Brown L. March 2003. MEASURE Evaluation Manual Series, No.7.) offers practical guidelines for measuring capacity in the health sector at different levels: individual, organizational, system-wide and in the community. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/manuals/manuals.html
  • The older MEASURE publication by the same authors, "Mapping Capacity Building in the Health Sector" is a useful orientation to the measurement of capacity and suggests a mapping process before defining indicators. Examples of indicators of capacity at different levels and for different steps of a process chain are provided. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/special/special.html
  • Food Aid Management (FAM) has a number of resources on capacity building (PVO approaches, links) as well as assessment tools at the organizational and community level.  The organization of indicators is comparable to the recommendations of MEASURE’s publication and gives examples of composite indicators for specific elements of capacity. http://www.foodaidmanagement.org/capacitydocs3.htm#Docs
  • CSTS+’s Institutional Self-Assessment methodology, targets the organizational capacity of a PVO in its support and guidance to field based health programs.  It has also been adapted in the field to assess a PVO Program Office capacity to support a local partner. http://www.childsurvival.com/tools/project_planning.cfm
  • The Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool (OCAT) is presented in detail as an annex to USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation’s TIP N.15 “Measuring Institutional Capacity” http://www.dec.org/evals.cfm#1
  • There is an overlap between service assessment and capacity—particularly technical capacity— assessment.  See above for the TIPS publications

Component II.2.: Local Organizational Viability

  • Partnerships for Health Reform (Abt Associates) provides data collection instruments for a “Cost Study of Maternal Health Services.” (Some tools do not provide indicators, but may be used in developing some by assessing on cost issues.) http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/cmnht/tool29.pdf
  • EngenderHealth offers a Cost Analysis Tool: Simplifying Cost Analysis for Managers and Staff of Health Care Services  A tool health care staff can use to measure the direct costs of providing specific health services. Includes a description of the process, as well as a simple manual and computer worksheets to measure the costs of staff time and supplies used in the provision of a particular service. Results can be used to improve the efficiency of service delivery and to adjust user fees for services. http://www.engenderhealth.org/pubs/pubslist.html#quality
    Email: info@engenderhealth.org
  • CIDR (Centre International de Développement et de Recherche) has developed a methodological guide and a survey guide to assess the viability of primary health care centers in developing countries. The two guides are available in French and posted on CSTS+'s website with authorization from CIDR. http://www.childsurvival.com/tools/mon_eval.cfm Methodological support in using the methodology is available from Dr Bruno Galland (cidr@compuserve.com ).

Resources helpful for both organizational capacity and viability components

  • There is an overlap between service assessment and capacity--particularly technical capacity--assessment. See the COPE tool.

Dimension III: Community and Social Ecological Dimension

Component III.1.: Community Competence / Capacity

  • Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Communication Programs has developed a “Model for Measuring the Process and Its Outcomes in Communication for Social Change” interventions.  This will provide guidelines and tools for the development of indicators of social change and community capacity. http://www.rockfound.org/Documents/540/socialchange.pdf
  • Save the Children has used the Rifkin pentagram model to measure the capacity of Health Committees and the nature and extent of community participation in their management. The Measurement section of the CSSA presentation chapter presents examples of elements assessed, indicators and performance criteria.

Component III.2.: Social ecological environment

A number of tools and resources are really outside of the parameters of what a CS project could address on its own, but they address the larger systemic component of the CSSA framework

  • USAID’s New Partnership Initiative (NPI) Strategic Framework represents the set of results that are necessary to achieve more effective response by civil society, business and democratic local governance in collaboratively addressing development challenges. A resource guide is available. http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/npi/npiresrc.htm
  • The Millennium Development Goals provide indicators at the national level (actually including global health outcomes indicators also). www.developmentgoals.org
  • The “Compendium of Sustainable Development Indicator Initiatives and Publications” provides an overview of initiatives on sustainable development indicators being carried out at the international, national and provincial/territorial/state levels. It also presents useful reviews of models and examples of indicators and their development. http://iisd1.iisd.ca/measure/compindex.asp http://iisd.ca/cgsdi/intro_dashboard.htm
  • The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has resources on capacity building and its assessment, generally focusing on larger systemic issues (governance, poverty, public sector). http://magnet.undp.org/cdrb/DEFAULT.htm
  • Unfortunately lacking in a developing country perspective, "Measuring Community Success and Sustainability" is a workbook describing a process to help communities learn how to measure the local impacts of development processes that enhance community sustainability http://www.ncrcrd.iastate.edu/Community_Success/about.html
  • The WHO tool presented above also addresses policy, resources, monitoring, health promotion and training relating to Maternal and Neonatal Health.

 Back to main sustainability page


 


 


 CSTS+ Project/Macro International
 Phone: 301-572-0823
 Email: csts@macrointernational.com


 CORE          PVO NGO Community          CSHGP