Training
of Survey Trainers Workshop
|
15
Participants Trained In KPC 2000 Methodology
|
Myrtle
Beach, SC
June
11–21, 2002
|
Curamericas
hosted the two week training of survey trainers which was based on
the CORE/CSTS+ KPC 2000 modules and Field Guide.
Trainer
Tom Davis piloted an updated curriculum being developed for the CORE
Monitoring and Evaluation working group. David Shanklin of Curamericas
served as co-facilitator and logistics coordinator.
The
KPC 2000 Self-Instructing Field Guide and the KPC 2000 Modules, including
the Rapid CATCH, may be downloaded from http://www.childsurvival.com/kpc2000/kpc2000.cfm.
The
KPC 2000 Modules are available in English, French, and Spanish.
Lot Quality Assurance
Sampling was discussed as one option for selecting survey respondents.
Click
here for the participant list
Ten
TOST Take-Away hints were highlighted in summary:
 
- In the survey
design phase, start by identifying priority health Results and
a concise, manageable set of indicators using standard
definitions to facilitate comparability. It is recommended
that all of the Rapid CATCH indicators be included. (The purpose
of the Rapid CATCH and additional KPC modules is to provide easy
access to a core set of standard indicators related to Child Survival
and health objectives. These standard indicators are generally comparable
to DHS and MICS.)
- Don’t get carried
away! Repeat, select a concise, manageable set of indictors
in addition to the Rapid CATCH. Collect only project data you need
and will use. Focus on Results and indicators in which the project
may plan to bring about a measurable change.
Once the results and indicators are chosen, select the questions
needed to measure these indicators and construct the questionnaire.
- Include
the most important background info for factors related to differential
child health and nutritional status in your context, e.g. SES, ethnicity,
HH Food Security, rural/urban, etc. Consider if you are interested
in tracking equity in health and nutrition access and coverage between
these identified groups.
- Pretest,
test and then practice, practice, practice with the data collection
instrument including weighing infants and children prior to
going into the field for actual data collection.
- Use a reasonably
representative sample of the population you are interested in
describing. For cluster sampling, remember to take the design effect
into account. For LQAS, respect the principle of random sampling,
that each unit (e.g. mother or caretaker of a child under two years)
in the population should have an equal and independent chance to
be selected in the sample.
- Remember that
a sample survey provides population estimates. Don’t forget
to report Confidence Intervals and make use of this information
when setting targets for measuring change. (Confidence intervals
for time 1 and time 2 estimates should not overlap for a change
to be considered statistically significant.)
- Involve
staff and partners in discussing the findings.
What do you still need to know about health practices? Can you use
qualitative information to increase your knowledge about how and
why maternal and child health and nutrition behaviors and practices
are what they are?
- Use
quantitative and qualitative information together as a basis
for selecting project results, indicators and targets. Once
identified, these results objectives provide the foundation for
project planning. The DIP will be developed with the aim of attaining
these results targets.
- At mid-term
(or during periodic monitoring of progress towards results) and
final evaluation, look back to the baseline estimates and results
targets. Publicly display a graphic representing key results
indicator baselines, targets and periodic progress being made
towards these targets.
- When there
is a new project area being added to an existing project area, compare
data from where you have been working to the new area where you
plan to start intervening. In addition to being able to compare
the baseline with the EOP findings, you can now make a cross-sectional
comparison between the two areas. This is a much stronger design.
Sustainability may also be documented by returning to survey
the first project area in conjunction with the EOP survey of the
follow-on project in an adjacent area.
|